• Arch Intern Med · Jun 2002

    Review Meta Analysis

    Sildenafil for male erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    • Howard A Fink, Roderick Mac Donald, Indulis R Rutks, David B Nelson, and Timothy J Wilt.
    • Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1 Veterans Dr, PO Box 11G, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA. howard.fink@med.va.gov
    • Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jun 24; 162 (12): 134913601349-60.

    ObjectiveTo determine the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction.Data SourcesThe MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, Current Contents, and Cochrane Library databases (January 1, 1995, through December 31, 2000); bibliographies of retrieved articles and review articles; conference proceedings abstracts; the Food and Drug Administration Web site; and the manufacturer.Study SelectionTrials were eligible if they included men with erectile dysfunction, compared sildenafil with control, were randomized, were of at least 7 days' duration, and assessed clinically relevant outcomes.Data ExtractionTwo reviewers independently evaluated study quality and extracted data in a standardized fashion.Data SynthesisTwenty-seven trials (6659 men) met the inclusion criteria. In results pooled from 14 parallel-group, flexible as-needed dosing trials, sildenafil was more likely than placebo to lead to successful sexual intercourse, with a higher percentage of successful intercourse attempts (57% vs 21%; weighted mean difference, 33.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 29.2-38.2; 2283 men) and a greater percentage of men experiencing at least 1 intercourse success during treatment (83% vs 45%; relative benefit increase, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.7-1.9; 2205 men). In data pooled from 6 parallel-group, fixed-dose trials, efficacy appeared slightly greater at higher doses. Treatment response appeared to vary between patient subgroups, although relative to placebo, sildenafil significantly improved erectile function in all evaluated subgroups. In trials with parallel-group design and flexible dosing, men randomized to receive sildenafil were less likely than those receiving placebo to drop out for any reason and no more likely to drop out due to an adverse event or laboratory abnormality. Specific adverse events with sildenafil included flushing (12%), headache (11%), dyspepsia (5%), and visual disturbances (3%); all adverse events were significantly less likely to occur with placebo. Sildenafil was not significantly associated with serious cardiovascular events or death.ConclusionsSildenafil improves erectile function and is generally well tolerated. Treatment response seems to vary between patient subgroups, although sildenafil has greater efficacy than placebo in all evaluated subgroups.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…