• Lei Wu, Li Yang, Yanyan Yang, Xin Wu, and Jun Zhang.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong'An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
• J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Jun 1; 38 (3): 731739731-739.

AbstractLung recruitment manoeuvres (RMs) during mechanical ventilation may reduce atelectasis, however, the optimal recruitment strategy for patients undergoing thoracic surgery remains unknown. Our study was designed to investigate whether ultrasound-guided lung RMs is superior to conventional RMs in reducing perioperative atelectasis during thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation. We conducted a randomised controlled clinical trial from August 2022 to September 2022. Sixty patients scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) under general anaesthesia were enrolled. Subjects were randomly divided into the ultrasound-guided RMs group (manual inflation guided by lung ultrasound) or conventional RMs group (manual inflation with 30 cmH2O pressure). Lung ultrasound were performed at three predefined time points (1 min after anaesthetic induction; after RMs at the end of surgery; before discharge from postanesthesia care unit [PACU]). The primary outcome was lung ultrasound score before discharge from the PACU after extubation. In the early postoperative period, lung aeration deteriorated in both groups even after lung RMs. However, ultrasound-guided lung RMs had significantly lower lung ultrasound scores when compared with conventional RMs in bilateral lungs (2.0 [0.8-4.0] vs. 8.0 [3.8-10.3], P < 0.01) at the end of surgery, which remained before patients discharged from the PACU. Accordingly, the lower incidence of atelectasis was found in ultrasound-guided RMs group than in conventional RMs group (7% vs. 53%; P < 0.01) at the end of surgery. Ultrasound-guided RMs is superior to conventional RMs in improving lung aeration and reducing the incidence of lung atelectasis at early postoperative period in patients undergoing VATS. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (No. 220,825,810; date of approval: August 5, 2022) and registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2200062761).© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

37 keywords...

hide…