• Maya Hatley, Olivia Korostoff-Larsson, Tahir Malik, Saul Blecker, and Kevin P Eaton.
• Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
• J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Sep 1; 30 (6): 936940936-940.

RationaleCardiac monitoring has often been identified as an area of overutilization and remains a limited resource in many hospitals. With the aim of reducing telemetry overuse, we added clinical decision support to our health system's telemetry order with guidance on appropriate indications for monitoring. The new order requires selection of an appropriate clinical indication.Aims And ObjectivesIn this study, we aimed to understand provider engagement with this tool by assessing concordance between selected indications within the order and the clinical presence of those conditions as documented within the patient chart.MethodsWe randomly selected 100 telemetry orders from July to October 2022 across four different hospitals at NYU Langone Health. Two independent, blinded reviewers used a structured protocol to identify documentation of actual indications for telemetry in each selected chart. We calculated the rate of concordance between indications selected in the order and indications that were determined to be clinically present on chart review.ResultsThere were 30,839 telemetry orders placed during the study timeframe. Overall concordance between the selection within the order and the actual indication was 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.21%-57.79%). We observed especially low concordance rates for vague indications, such as 'Other', and for 'Confirmed Stroke', which was the only indication allowing for indefinite telemetry.ConclusionThe overall low concordance suggests a disconnect between the support tool and clinical practice. Providers are more likely to select an indication that reduces downstream work regardless of a patient's true clinical indication.© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

17 keywords...

hide…