• Luca Quartuccio, Elena Treppo, Maria De Martino, Maria Pillon, Simone Perniola, Dario Bruno, Miriam Isola, and Elisa Gremese.
• Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy. luca.quartuccio@uniud.it.
• Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 2.

AbstractGlucocorticoids (GCs) are still the mainstay of treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Although GCs are highly effective in GCA, the high burden of toxicity of GCs as well as the disease relapse during GC tapering is well documented. To compare the efficacy and rapidity of TCZ and MTX as steroid-sparing agents in a real-life cohort of GCA patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted including patients with newly diagnosed GCA from the Rheumatology Units of Udine and Rome. The inclusion criterion was the treatment with TCZ or MTX as first steroid-sparing drug. 112 GCA patients (81 females) with a median age of 70 (IQ 65-75) years were collected. Thirty-one out of 112 (27.7%) patients were treated with TCZ (162 mg/week), while 81/112 (72.3%) patients received MTX (up to 20 mg/week) as a GC-sparing agent. At month 6 after GCA onset, 5/31 (16.1%) patients in TCZ group and none in MTX group were in GC-free sustained remission (p value = 0.001). Similarly, at month 12, 64.5% (20/31) and 11.1% (9/81) of patients were in sustained GC-free remission in TCZ and MTX group, respectively (p value <0.001). At month 24 of follow-up, at least one relapse of the disease occurred in 7/31 (22.6%) in TCZ-treated and 28/81 (34.6%) in MTX-treated patients, respectively (p value = 0.22). TCZ allowed a faster discontinuation of steroid therapy than MTX in GCA patients, without increasing the risk of relapse.© 2024. The Author(s).

6 keywords...

hide…