• J Formos Med Assoc · Aug 2024

    Comparison of the clinicoradiological features and outcomes of lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma and conventional intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.

    • Yan-Chih Peng, Sih-Han Liao, Jia-Huei Tsai, Po-Ting Chen, Chin-Chen Chang, Jia-Horng Kao, and Kao-Lang Liu.
    • Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan.
    • J Formos Med Assoc. 2024 Aug 14.

    Background/PurposeLymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma (LELCC) is a rare variant of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). We aim to analyze the differences in the clinical and radiological features of LELCC and ICC.MethodsBetween January 2003 and December 2019, a total of 21 patients diagnosed with LELCC were retrospectively enrolled, and 84 patients with ICC were selected through propensity score matching by sex, age, and initial cancer stage. The clinical characteristics, pathological findings, and radiological features were analyzed. The differences in overall survival (OS) between LELCC and ICC were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsThe serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level was higher in the ICC group than in the LELCC group (77.9 vs 30.0 U/mL, p = 0.004). Non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (47.1% vs 13.7%, p = 0.005) and portovenous washout (35.3% vs 4.1%, p = 0.001) were more frequently observed in the LELCC group than in the ICC group. Intrahepatic duct dilatation was a distinct feature of the ICC group. The 5-year OS rates in the LELCC and ICC groups were 69.3% and 58.2%, respectively (p = 0.047). The 5-year OS of patients with stages I and II LELCC between ICC were not significantly different (90.0% vs 83.4%, p = 0.464). However, the 5-year OS of patients with stages III and IV LELCC was more favorable than that of patients with ICC (29.2% vs 23.0%, p = 0.017).ConclusionsLELCC had a favorable outcome and several different clinicoradiological features compared with ICC.Copyright © 2024 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.