-
- ENTRUST-PE Network, Neil E O'Connell, Joletta Belton, Geert Crombez, Christopher Eccleston, Emma Fisher, Michael C Ferraro, Anna Hood, Francis Keefe, Roger Knaggs, Emma Norris, Tonya M Palermo, Gisèle Pickering, Esther Pogatzki-Zahn, Andrew Sc Rice, Georgia Richards, Daniel Segelcke, Keith M Smart, Nadia Soliman, Gavin Stewart, Thomas Tölle, Dennis Turk, Jan Vollert, Elaine Wainwright, Jack Wilkinson, and WilliamsAmanda C de CACCDept of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, UK..
- Department of Health Sciences, Centre for Wellbeing Across the Lifecourse, Brunel University London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: neil.oconnell@brunel.ac.uk.
- J Pain. 2024 Nov 16: 104736104736.
AbstractThe personal, social and economic burden of chronic pain is enormous. Tremendous research efforts are being directed toward understanding, preventing, and managing chronic pain. Yet patients with chronic pain, clinicians and the public are sometimes poorly served by an evidence architecture that contains multiple structural weaknesses. These include incomplete research governance, a lack of diversity and inclusivity, inadequate stakeholder engagement, poor methodological rigour and incomplete reporting, a lack of data accessibility and transparency, and a failure to communicate findings with appropriate balance. These issues span pre-clinical research, clinical trials and systematic reviews and impact the development of clinical guidance and practice. Research misconduct and inauthentic data present a further critical risk. Combined, they increase uncertainty in this highly challenging area of study and practice, drive the provision of low value care, increase costs and impede the discovery of more effective solutions. In this focus article, we explore how we can increase trust in pain science, by examining critical challenges using contemporary examples, and describe a novel integrated conceptual framework for enhancing the trustworthiness of pain science. We end with a call for collective action to address this critical issue. PERSPECTIVE: Multiple challenges can adversely impact the trustworthiness of pain research and health research more broadly. We present ENTRUST-PE, a novel, integrated framework for more trustworthy pain research with recommendations for all stakeholders in the research ecosystem, and make a call to action to the pain research community.Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.