• Shelly Choo, Henry Perry, Afua A J Hesse, Francis Abantanga, Elias Sory, Hayley Osen, Charles Fleischer-Djoleto, Rachel Moresky, Colin W McCord, Meena Cherian, and Fizan Abdullah.
• Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
• Trop. Med. Int. Health. 2010 Sep 1;15(9):1109-15.

ObjectivesTo survey infrastructure characteristics, personnel, equipment and procedures of surgical, obstetric and anaesthesia care in 17 hospitals in Ghana.MethodsThe assessment was completed by WHO country offices using the World Health Organization Tool for Situational Analysis to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care, which surveyed infrastructure, human resources, types of surgical interventions and equipment in each facility.ResultsOverall, hospitals were well equipped with general patient care and surgical supplies. The majority of hospitals had a basic laboratory (100%), running water (94%) and electricity (82%). More than 75% had the basic supplies needed for general patient care and basic intra-operative care, including sterilization. Almost all hospitals were able to perform major surgical procedures such as caesarean sections (88%), herniorrhaphy (100%) and appendectomy (94%), but formal training of providers was limited: a few hospitals had a fully qualified surgeon (29%) or obstetrician (36%) available.ConclusionsThe greatest barrier to improving surgical care at district hospitals in Ghana is the shortage of adequately trained medical personnel for emergency and essential surgical procedures. Important future steps include strengthening their number and qualifications.© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

23 keywords...

hide…