• Selcen Tekin, Ismet Topcu, Neriman Z Ekici, Husnu Caglar, and Tuna Erincler.
• Guzelyurt Mah. Ingolstadt Cad, Anadolu Konutlari No:11, 45030, Manisa, Turkey. selcengeraslan@hotmail.com
• Saudi Med J. 2006 Aug 1;27(8):1199-203.

ObjectiveTo compare the analgesic and side effects of bupivacaine in combinations with neostigmine and fentanyl using patient-controlled-epidural analgesia (PCEA) methods in the postoperative period after abdominal hysterectomy.MethodsSeventy-five adult American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II patients, aged 18-65 years were included in the study. The study took place in Celal Bayar University Hospital, Turkey between 2003-2004 years. After preoperative epidural catheterization, the patients were operated under general anesthesia. After surgery, the patients were randomly allocated in a double-blinded manner to receive PCEA and divided into 3 groups: Group B: 0.125% bupivacaine, Group N: 0.125% bupivacaine plus neostigmine 4 ug kg-1 and Group F: 0.125% bupivacaine plus 1 ug kg-1 fentanyl solutions (10 mL loading dose, 5 mL bolus dose, 10 min lockout time, 30 mL in 4 hour limit). During the following 24 hours, hemodynamic parameters, pain score using visual analog scale, total analgesic consumption, additional analgesic requirements, sedation, satisfaction, nausea scores and probable side-effects were evaluated.ResultsTotal analgesic consumption was 143.7 +/- 7.2 mL in Group B, 123.4 +/- 6.2 mL in Group N and 106 +/- 8.3 mL in Groups F. The mean value in Group F was significantly lower than Group N and Group B (p<0.05), and was lower in Group N than Group B. Visual analog scale scores were lower in Group F than other groups (p<0.05). There were no differences in side effects between all groups.ConclusionFentanyl and neostigmine by the PCEA method can be used safely for postoperative analgesia after gynecologic surgery. They increase analgesia quality and satisfaction without an increase in side effects.

28 keywords...

hide…