-
Circ Cardiovasc Qual · May 2014
Decision making for destination therapy left ventricular assist devices: "there was no choice" versus "I thought about it an awful lot".
- Colleen K McIlvennan, Larry A Allen, Carolyn Nowels, Andreas Brieke, Joseph C Cleveland, and Daniel D Matlock.
- From the Section of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplantation, Division of Cardiology (C.K.M., L.A.A., A.B.), Division of General Internal Medicine (C.N., D.D.M.), and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.C.C.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; and Colorado Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium, Denver (C.K.M., L.A.A., D.D.M.). colleen.mcilvennan@ucdenver.edu.
- Circ Cardiovasc Qual. 2014 May 1;7(3):374-80.
BackgroundDestination therapy left ventricular assist devices (DT LVADs) are one of the most invasive medical interventions for end-stage illness. How patients decide whether or not to proceed with device implantation is unknown. We aimed to understand the decision-making processes of patients who either accept or decline DT LVADs.Methods And ResultsBetween October 2012 and September 2013, we conducted semistructured, in-depth interviews to understand patients' decision-making experiences. Data were analyzed using a mixed inductive and deductive approach. Twenty-two eligible patients were interviewed, 15 with DT LVADs and 7 who declined. We found a strong dichotomy between decision processes with some patients (11 accepters) being automatic and others (3 accepters, 7 decliners) being reflective in their approach to decision making. The automatic group was characterized by a fear of dying and an over-riding desire to live as long as possible: "[LVAD] was the only option I had…that or push up daisies…so I automatically took this." By contrast, the reflective group went through a reasoned process of weighing risks, benefits, and burdens: "There are worse things than death." Irrespective of approach, most patients experienced the DT LVAD decision as a highly emotional process and many sought support from their families or spiritually.ConclusionsSome patients offered a DT LVAD face the decision by reflecting on a process and reasoning through risks and benefits. For others, the desire to live supersedes such reflective processing. Acknowledging this difference is important when considering how to support patients who are faced with this complex decision.© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.