• G Jensen, A Ellwein, C Voigt, J C Katthagen, and H Lill.
• Abteilung des Berufsgenossenschaftlichen Unfallkrankenhauses Hamburg, Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Diakoniekrankenhaus Friederikenstift gGmbH Hannover, Humboldtstr. 5, 30169, Hannover, Deutschland. gunnar.jensen@ddh-gruppe.de.
• Unfallchirurg. 2015 Dec 1; 118 (12): 1041-53; quiz 1054-5.

AbstractAcute acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries are common in clinical practice. The hook plate is a well-established conventional operative treatment option for high grade instability; however, arthroscopically-assisted flexible double button techniques are increasingly being used. Both procedures lead to good or excellent results. The advantages of the hook plate are the simple surgical technique and the possibility of an early functional aftercare. The minimally invasive one-step procedure with the possibility of identification and treatment of frequently concomitant glenohumeral pathologies is advantageous for the arthroscopic technique but mobilization is more restrictive. Available comparative studies have shown no significant clinical differences but a tendency towards better results with a higher degree of acceptance among patients for the arthroscopic and minimally invasive non-rigid double button procedures.

23 keywords...

hide…