• Jung-Hee Ryu, Minsuk Kim, Jae-Hyon Bahk, Sang-Hwan Do, Il-Young Cheong, and Yong-Chul Kim.
• Department of Anaesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Seoul National University, Bundang Hospital, Seongnam - Korea.
• Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar 1;19(2):240-6.

PurposeThis randomized, double-blinded, prospective study was performed to compare the intraoperative hemodynamic variables and the patient-reported outcomes, such as intra- and postoperative analgesia and patient satisfaction, of retrobulbar block, sub-Tenon block, and topical anesthesia during cataract surgery under monitored anesthesia care.MethodsEighty-one patients, ASA physical status I-III, undergoing elective cataract surgery under monitored anesthesia care, aged between 43 and 78 years, were randomly assigned to three groups: retrobulbar block (group R), sub-Tenon block (group S), or topical anesthesia (group T). Three minutes after the start of monitored anesthesia care with lidocaine-propofol-remifentanil mixture, an ophthalmologist performed regional anesthesia. Intraoperative hemodynamics, pain score, and patients' satisfaction with the anesthetic experiences were recorded by a study-blinded anesthesiologist.ResultsMean arterial pressure and heart rate in group R were significantly higher than those in groups S and T during and just after the regional block (p<0.05). Group R required smaller dosage of patient controlled sedation and fewer supplemental bolus doses than groups S and T (p<0.05). On the other hand, group S showed the highest satisfaction scores among the three groups (p<0.05).ConclusionsSub-Tenon block seems to be better than retrobulbar block and topical anesthesia in patient satisfaction though adequate analgesia was achieved after retrobulbar block during cataract surgery under monitored anesthesia care.

33 keywords...

hide…