• Josy Davidson, Claudia Gazzeta, Luciano C Torres, José R Jardim, and Oliver A Nascimento.
• Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
• Resp Care. 2012 Jul 1;57(7):1071-5.

BackgroundOxygen therapy is an important therapeutic resource for patients with hypoxemia. When changing oxygen flow meters, we have observed that sometimes, even with the same oxygen flow setting as before, a different S(pO(2)) is obtained.ObjectiveTo analyze the precision and accuracy of flow meters used in hospital settings.MethodsAn experimental study was performed to test oxygen flow meters from a tertiary hospital, by using a calibrated flow analyzer. Used and new flow meter accuracy was tested by reading in the gas analyzer a single measurement at flow rates of 1, 3, 5, and 10 L/min in 91 flow meters, and they were compared using the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Flow meter precision was tested by reading in the flow analyzer 3 repetitive measurements set at flow rates of 1, 3, 5, and 10 L/min in 11 flow meters, and the reproducibility of these measurements was conducted by using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Friedman test.ResultsThe mean measured flow rates were slightly lower than the stipulated flow rate at 1 L/min, very close for 3 L/min, and higher for the 5 and 10 L/min flow rates. There was a large variability among the measurements from different flow meters, mainly at low flow rates (1 and 3 L/min). There was no difference between new and used flow meters at the flow rates measured, except at 10 L/min. Flow meters precision analysis showed a good reproducibility in 3 repetitive measurements for each flow rate (minimum 0.95, maximum 0.99 intraclass correlations).ConclusionsThe flow meters tested showed good precision and poor accuracy.

10 keywords...

hide…