• M T DePalma, W M Koszewski, W Romani, J G Case, N J Zuiderhof, and P M McCoy.
• Department of Psychology, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA. depalma@ithaca.edu
• Br J Sports Med. 2002 Feb 1;36(1):45-50.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of a discriminant function that predicts risk of pathogenic eating in comparison with a standard self report measure (EAT) and a clinical interview. In addition, to determine the effectiveness of this discriminant function using a variety of collegiate athletes.MethodsA total of 319 participants were asked to complete a series of self report measures that assessed dietary practices. In addition, anthropometric measures were obtained, and a random sample of 15% participated in a structured clinical interview.ResultsCorrelational analyses indicated that the discriminant function categorisation of risk was significantly related to both the clinical interview and EAT (p < or =0.05). The discriminant function was accurate in predicting risk category in this diverse group of athletes, particularly with respect to those at low risk (83.1%) and those at high risk (72.7%).ConclusionThis information may be helpful in the development of a simple, accessible tool to identify athletes at risk of engaging in pathogenic eating behaviours.

24 keywords...

hide…