• S Fernández de Miguel, M Gaboli, R González-Celador, P Gómez de Quero, V Murga Herrero, J M Sánchez Granados, and R Payo Pérez.
• Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, España. sira007@hotmail.com
• An Pediatr (Barc). 2010 Mar 1;72(3):165-71.

ObjectiveTo estimate the accuracy of the transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension measurement (PtCO(2)) compared to the measurement of the arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO(2)).Material And MethodsAn analytical, longitudinal, prospective and observational study, of a dynamic cohort taken from the in-patients of a Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). The PtCO(2) was measured with the SenTec AG analyzer, and the sensor was applied with the specific Multi-Site Attachment Ring. PtCO(2) and PaCO(2) were recorded at the same time. The statistical significance of the association between paired measurements was evaluated with the Snedecor's F test, the Pearson's r(2) correlation coefficient and the Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The degree of agreement was evaluated with the Bland & Altman method. The consistency of the results was evaluated with the ANalysis Of the VAriance (ANOVA).ResultsOne hundred and six paired measurements, PtCO(2) and PaCO(2), from twelve patients, were compared. The means of the PaCO(2) and PtCO(2) were 51.0+/-13mmHg and 50.1+/-14mmHg, respectively; r(2)=0.87 (p<0.001), ICC=0.96, (95% CI: 0.94-0.97). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of-0.9mmHg (95% CI:-2.0 to 0.2mmHg). The correlation was better in cases with no respiratory disease, with low respiratory assistance, with PaCO(2)>50mmHg and with the sensor applied on the forehead. The results were consistent. No side effects derived from the use of the ring were observed.ConclusionThe correlation between PtCO(2) and PaCO(2) is excellent and stable. The ring sensor was safe and easy to use.2009 Asociación Española de Pediatría. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

12 keywords...

hide…