-
Comparative Study
Efficacy of specific aseptic precautions for preventing propofol-related infections: analysis by a quality-assurance programme using the explicit outcome method.
- M D Seeberger, S Staender, D Oertli, C H Kindler, and W Marti.
- Department of Anaesthesia, University of Basel, Kantonsspital, Switzerland. seeberger@ubaclu.unibas.ch.
- J. Hosp. Infect. 1998 May 1;39(1):67-70.
AbstractSpecific aseptic precautions have been recommended for preventing infectious complications of propofol because its lipid base can support bacterial growth if contaminated. To study whether the precautions used at our institution prevent propofol-related infections, we retrospectively analysed the data covering 1 January, 1995 until 30 June, 1996 held in our quality-assurance database. The database contains prospectively collected, detailed and standardized information of each patient's risk factors, anaesthetic and surgical data, and postoperative outcome. Surgical patients who had received propofol for anaesthesia did not have a higher incidence of postoperative infection, thus demonstrating the efficacy of our aseptic precautions.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..