• Chest · Aug 1996

    Pulmonary epithelial permeability. An animal study of inverse ratio ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation.

    • U Ludwigs, A Philip, B Robertson, and G Hedenstierna.
    • Department of Medicine, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
    • Chest. 1996 Aug 1;110(2):486-93.

    Study ObjectiveTo compare pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation (PCIRV) with volume-controlled ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (VCV PEEP) at equal levels of end-expiratory alveolar pressure. The primary focus of the study was on pulmonary epithelial permeability. Histologic and gravimetric indicators of lung injury were also studied.DesignRandomized animal study.SettingExperimental investigation at Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.AnimalsThirty-two New Zealand white rabbits.InterventionsVentilation with PCIRV or VCV PEEP for 6 h at an end-expiratory pressure level of 5 cm H2O.Measurements And ResultsLung mechanics, heart rate, BP, and gas exchange. Measurement of pulmonary epithelial permeability by 99mTc-DTPA lung clearance. Extravascular lung water by gravimetric analysis. Morphology by light microscopy after a perfusion fixation procedure. Mean and peak airway pressures were 12.4 +/- 4.3 and 15.9 +/- 4.5 cm H2O with PCIRV and 8.6 +/- 0.8 (p < 0.001) and 19.9 +/- 4.1 cm H2O (p < 0.03) with VCV PEEP at 6 h. Mean systemic BP was lower with PCIRV (58 +/- 9 mm Hg) than with VCV PEEP (68 +/- 7 mm Hg) at 6 h (p < 0.003). At 6 h, PaCO2 was lower with PCIRV (3.2 +/- 0.6 kPa) than with VCV PEEP (4.1 +/- 0.8 kPa) (p < 0.02). There was no difference in blood oxygenation between PCIRV and VCV PEEP. 99mTc-DTPA lung clearance curves were monoexponential with both PCIRV and VCV PEEP. Mean lung clearance expressed as T 1/2 was 16 +/- 9 min with PCIRV and 107 +/- 74 min with VCV PEEP (p < 0.001). Morphologic examination revealed no differences between the groups and no evidence of significant lung injury.ConclusionsThe observations reported in this article imply that PCIRV causes an alteration in lung epithelial or membrane function in comparison to VCV PEEP. This functional difference is most likely caused by the large time-adjusted lung volume produced by pressure control in combination with a prolonged inspiration. It remains to be established whether this early functional effect of PCIRV is relevant with regard to structural lung injury in mechanically ventilated subjects.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.