• An. Esp. Pediatr. · Mar 1997

    Comparative Study

    [The evaluation of autopsy in the pediatric intensive unit].

    • A Castellanos Ortega, F Ortiz Melón, M García Fuentes, F Prieto Valderrey, J P Santidrián Miguel, and F Mazorra Macho.
    • UCI Pediátrica, Departamento de medicina intensiva, Valdecilla, Santander.
    • An. Esp. Pediatr. 1997 Mar 1;46(3):224-8.

    ObjectiveBecause of concerns about the declining autopsy rate, an attempt was made to evaluate the contributions from the postmortem examination in children.Patients And MethodsWe carried out a retrospective comparison analysis between clinical and pathological diagnosis of 56 consecutive autopsies performed on children who died in the PICU during the period 1983-1995.ResultsThe autopsy rate was 60%. Autopsy provided valuable clinical information in 50% of the cases. There were major diagnostic errors in three patients (5%), that if detected before death would probably have improved survival. Another 14 cases (25%) showed missed clinical diagnoses related to the basic illness and the cause of death, whose premortem diagnosis would not have prolonged survival. There were no diagnostic discrepancies in 28 cases (50%). The most unexpected findings revealed by the autopsies were iatrogenics (10 cases), metabolic diseases (4 cases), congenital immunodeficiency syndromes (4 cases) and pulmonary opportunistic infections (3 cases). Eight of these diseases were genetic. An age < 12 months or and ICU stay < 24 hours were not predicting factors of a higher incidence of major diagnostic errors.ConclusionsThe value of the autopsy as quality assurance and to detect iatrogenics and occult genetic diseases is unquestionable. New strategies have to be designed to increase the rate of autopsies.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.