• J Emerg Nurs · Aug 2001

    Multicenter Study

    Adequacy of pain assessment and pain relief and correlation of patient satisfaction in 68 ED fast-track patients.

    • F S Blank, T J Mader, J Wolfe, M Keyes, R Kirschner, and D Provost.
    • Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA. del.blank@bhs.org
    • J Emerg Nurs. 2001 Aug 1;27(4):327-34.

    IntroductionThe new standards of the joint commission on accreditation of healthcare organizations specify the patient's right to appropriate assessment and management of pain. With this impetus, we looked at our own practice to see how well we assess and manage patients with pain.MethodsPatients who presented with minor nonemergent pain were interviewed on arrival, and then again before discharge, with use of a structured questionnaire. A total of 68 completed pain surveys were analyzed.ResultsWith use of a visual analog scale, patients rated their pain on arrival and at discharge; they also rated pain they were willing to accept when it was time for discharge. Sixty percent of the patients went home with more pain than they were willing to accept. Fifty-one percent of the patients were offered something for pain, and only half of them said the pain relief was adequate. The median time from arrival to administration of pain medication was 104 minutes. Surprisingly, the median patient satisfaction rating for overall care was "very good."DiscussionThis survey revealed that acute pain conditions are underevaluated and undertreated in one fast-track setting, suggesting that ED staff need more education about the management of acute pain. It also showed that relying on patient satisfaction surveys as surrogate markers for how well we manage pain is erroneous.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…