-
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg · Jan 2006
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative StudyRopivacaine versus bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 1 microg/ml for epidural labour analgesia: is daily practice more important than pharmaceutical choice?
- T Girard, C Kern, I Hösli, A Heck, and M C Schneider.
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital, Kantonsspital Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland. thierry.girard@unibas.ch
- Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2006 Jan 1;57(1):45-9.
UnlabelledRopivacaine might be superior to bupivcaine for epidural labour analgesia because it appears to induce less lower extremity motor blockade. The clinical relevance of this difference is not yet clear.MethodsIn a double-blind randomised trial bupivacaine and ropivacaine each at 0.125% with 1 microg/ml fentanyl were compared for epidural labour analgesia. This study was performed in two university hospitals.ResultsSixty-three nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies at term were included. There were no differences between bupivacaine and ropivacaine as far as motor blockade, analgesic outcome, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome are concerned. However, the clinical management of epidural analgesia differed significantly between the two institutions involved. Parturients of one institution had their epidural catheter placed earlier, needed less top-up medication, and had more successful mobilisations, when compared to the other institution.ConclusionsInstitutional clinical practice can be significantly different. Pharmacological differences between bupivacaine and ropivacaine at 0.125% with 1 microg/ml fentanyl seem to be less important than differences between institutions in terms of clinical practice.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.