• Tal Malach, Ziona Jerassy, Bernard Rudensky, Yechiel Schlesinger, Etty Broide, Oded Olsha, Amos M Yinnon, and David Raveh.
• Infectious Disease Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
• Am J Infect Control. 2006 Jun 1;34(5):308-12.

BackgroundGuidelines have been published for prevention of phlebitis associated with peripheral intravenous catheters (IVC), but this complication continues to occur. We sought to determine the rate of phlebitis associated with peripheral IVCs to identify predictors for phlebitis and to isolate pathogenic bacteria from phlebitic catheter tips.MethodsNine-point prevalence studies were conducted during the years 1996-2003 of all hospitalized patients with a peripheral IVC. During the last 3 surveys, conducted in 2003, phlebitic lines were removed, and, for each line, 1 to 2 nonphlebitic lines, in place for 48 to 72 hours, were removed and cultured as controls. In between these surveys, findings and guidelines for improvement were distributed to the staff.ResultsDuring these surveys, 40% +/- 8% of hospitalized patients had a peripheral IVC. The rate of peripheral IVC-associated phlebitis decreased from 12.7% (20/157) in 1998 to 2.6% (5/189) in 2003 (P < .01). Factors significantly associated with phlebitis included pain (P < .001), presence of the catheter for longer than 3 days (P < .05), and cleanliness of the dressing (P < .01).ConclusionThe rate of phlebitis associated with peripheral intravenous catheters decreased significantly throughout the study period. The identification of predictors for phlebitis and the dissemination of this information in an educational drive may have contributed to this improvement.

16 keywords...

hide…