-
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther · Jun 2008
Review[How to judge a good anaesthesia from a bad one - a critical review of recovery scores and other techniques to assess the result quality of anaesthesia procedures].
- Alexander Schellhaass and Joachim Boldt.
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin am Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen. schellal@klilu.de
- Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2008 Jun 1;43(6):428-33.
AbstractPatients, general public and health insurance funds focus more and more on the quality of medical performance. Anaesthesia related severe morbidity and mortality are unsuitable to judge the quality of an anaesthesia procedure. Other aspects like rapid and comfortable postoperative recovery or satisfaction of the patients with the anaesthesia procedure experience therefore rising attention. With this critical review we aim to give support for appraisal of already published studies and for design and realization of future trials.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..