-
Comparative Study
[Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Performance between Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope and McGRATH® MAC Video Laryngoscope among Anesthesia Trainees].
- Yusuke Kasuya, Emi Takahashi, Mirei Nagai, and Makoto Ozaki.
- Masui. 2015 Dec 1; 64 (12): 1291-6.
BackgroundFrom April 2013, Macintosh direct laryngoscopes (DL) were replaced by McGRATH® MAC video laryngoscopes (VL), and VL were distributed in all of our operating rooms and used as routine first choice devices. Purpose of this study was to compare the success rate of the first attempt tracheal intubation by the trainees with VL and DL. Incidence of tracheal intubation related injuries were also assessed.Materials And MethodsWe reviewed anesthesia chart database in which tracheal intubations were provided by anesthesia trainees with experience of less than 3 months. Patient demographics, Mallampati classification and tracheal intubation profiles including type of the tracheal tube and devices were recorded.Results And DiscussionThe first attempt success rate was 78.6% with DL and 92.8% with VL (P < 0.001). More than 2 repeated trial incidence was 5.2% with DL and 1.3% with VL (P < 0.001). Incidence of mucosal injury was lower with DL than VL.ConclusionsVL notably improved the first success rate of tracheal intubation compared with DL among trainees.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..