-
Plast. Reconstr. Surg. · Mar 2006
A cadaver study in preparation for facial allograft transplantation in humans: part I. What are alternative sources for total facial defect coverage?
- Maria Siemionow, Sakir Unal, Galip Agaoglu, and Alper Sari.
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. siemiom@ccf.org
- Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2006 Mar 1;117(3):864-72; discussion 873-5.
BackgroundReconstruction of facial defects in burn, trauma, and head-neck cancer patients is challenging. The lack of autogenous tissue availability and the need to match facial texture and color are major concerns.MethodsAnatomical dissections were performed to search for alternative sources for facial-scalp reconstructions in five cadavers. The composite facial-scalp flaps, radial forearm, anterolateral thigh, bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator, and bipedicled scapular-parascapular flaps were harvested. The total surface areas of the facial defects and alternative traditional flaps were measured.ResultsThe mean surface area for combined facial-scalp flaps and facial flaps without scalp was 1192 +/- 38.2 cm and 675 +/- 22.3 cm, respectively. When compared with the total surface area of the facial-scalp flap, it was found that the radial forearm flap covered 13 +/- 2.58 percent, the anterolateral thigh flap 19 +/- 3.72 percent, the bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap 35 +/- 1.56 percent, and the bipedicled scapular-parascapular flap 48 +/- 4.64 percent of the defect, respectively. When measurements were taken for coverage of the facial defect without scalp, it was found that the radial forearm flap covered 24 +/- 4.0 percent, the anterolateral thigh flap 34 +/- 6.50 percent, the bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap 62 +/- 3.03 percent, and the bipedicled scapular-parascapular flap 84 +/- 8.30 percent of the defect, respectively.ConclusionsThe authors' cadaver dissection confirmed that none of the conventional cutaneous autogenous flaps are able to cover total facial defects. Currently, the best option for reconstruction of the full facial defect is the autogenous bipedicled scapular-parascapular flap because of its large size and texture. However, perfect match of facial skin texture, pliability, and color can only be achieved by transplantation of the facial skin allograft from the human donor.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.