-
Review Comparative Study
High-dose corticosteroid therapy in human septic shock: has the jury reached a correct verdict?
- J Sjölin.
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
- Circ. Shock. 1991 Nov 1;35(3):139-51.
AbstractMany studies have been published concerning high-dose corticosteroids (HDC) in septic shock. Most of them have been criticized for not adhering to methodologic standards. Four studies were published during the 1980s taking into consideration the criticism of previous trials. The general conclusion following these trials was the HDC should not be used in the treatment of septic shock. The aim of this review is to compare these trials as regards their aims, study design, results, and conclusions. The validity of the data presented is discussed. It is concluded that there is no unequivocal evidence that HDC is beneficial in septic shock, but it must be realized that there are tremendous difficulties in obtaining the true state of affairs in clinical trials regarding patients in septic shock. Accumulated data indicate that HDC, given as one single dose during the initial hours of gram-negative septic shock, more likely than not has a beneficial effect on mortality.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.