• Circ Cardiovasc Qual · May 2013

    Comparative Study

    Long-term outcomes after invasive management for older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

    • Matthew T Roe, Shuang Li, Laine Thomas, Tracy Y Wang, Karen P Alexander, E Magnus Ohman, and Eric D Peterson.
    • Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 27705, USA. matthew.roe@duke.edu
    • Circ Cardiovasc Qual. 2013 May 1;6(3):323-32.

    BackgroundEarly invasive management is recommended for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), but the incidence of long-term outcomes after early catheterization among older patients and the relationship of revascularization procedures with outcomes in this population have not been described.Methods And ResultsUsing data from the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines (CRUSADE) registry, we linked 19 336 older patients (≥65 years) with non-ST-segment elevation MI found to have significant coronary disease during catheterization and who survived through 30 days posthospital discharge to Medicare/Medicaid data. All-cause mortality, readmission for MI, readmission for stroke, and use of repeat revascularization procedures were tracked for a median of 1181 days. Outcome comparisons were stratified by use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; n=11 766, 60.8%) or coronary artery bypass grafting (n=3515, 18.2%) performed during the index hospitalization and through 30 days postdischarge, as well as by medical management without revascularization (n=4055, 21.0%). During follow-up, ≈17% of patients underwent PCI (most commonly in patients initially treated with PCI), and only 3% of patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Compared with an unadjusted long-term mortality cumulative incidence through 5 years of 50% in the medical management group, mortality was lower in the PCI group (33.5%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.79) and lowest in the coronary artery bypass grafting group (24.2%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.57; P<0.001 for 3-way comparisons). The unadjusted cumulative incidence of the composite of death, readmission for MI, or readmission for stroke at 5 years was 62.4%, 44.9%, and 33.0% for medical management, PCI, and coronary artery bypass grafting, respectively.ConclusionsOlder patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI with significant coronary disease face high long-term risks for mortality and nonfatal cardiovascular outcomes after early catheterization that differ by type of revascularization procedure performed. These findings can help guide the design of studies evaluating long-term therapies among elderly post-MI patients.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…