• Critical care medicine · Jul 2000

    Limitations of the transpulmonary indicator dilution method for assessment of preload changes in critically ill patients with reduced left ventricular function.

    • G Mundigler, G Heinze, M Zehetgruber, H Gabriel, and P Siostrzonek.
    • Department of Cardiology, University of Vienna, Austria. gerald.mundigler@univie.ac.at
    • Crit. Care Med. 2000 Jul 1;28(7):2231-7.

    ObjectiveWe examined whether intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) and total end-diastolic volume (TEDV), determined by the transpulmonary indicator dilution technique, adequately reflect preload changes during fluid administration in patients with reduced left ventricular function.DesignA prospective, controlled, clinical study.SettingMedical intensive care unit in a university hospital.PatientsA total of 18 sedated, mechanically ventilated, and moderately hypovolemic intensive care unit patients, eight with reduced left ventricular function (ejection fraction area, 24.9+/-8.0%, group A), ten with normal left ventricular function (ejection fraction area, 57.6+/-13.0%, group B).InterventionsContinuous crystalloid infusion over 120 mins at a constant rate of 8 mL/kg/30 mins.Measurements And Main ResultsStroke volume index, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), TEDV, and ITBV were determined simultaneously at baseline and serially every 30 mins during continuous crystalloid infusion. A similar series of measurements was obtained during control conditions. Performance of various variables during fluid administration was assessed by time correlation analysis. Sensitivity for various variables defined as the ability to detect increasing amounts of administered fluid in individual patients was calculated. All examined variables increased during fluid administration and were unaffected during the control period. Mean time correlation (r2) was significantly higher for pressure monitoring (central venous pressure, r2 = 0.8281; PAOP, r2 = 0.5476) than for volume variables (TEDV, r2 = 0.0256; ITBV, r2 = 0.0729) in group A and was high for all variables in group B (central venous pressure, r2 = 0.7056; PAOP, r2 = 0.6241; TEDV, r2 = 0.49; ITBV, r2 = 0.4225). Sensitivities for central venous pressure, PAOP, TEDV, and ITBV after 120 min were 63%, 75%, 25%, and 25% in group A and 90%, 100%, 60%, and 60% in group B, respectively.ConclusionThis study demonstrates limitations of the transpulmonary indicator dilution technique for monitoring of intravascular volume in patients with reduced left ventricular function.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…