• Spine · Aug 2003

    Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain.

    • Xuemei Luo, Mandy Lynn George, Ikey Kakouras, Christopher L Edwards, Ricardo Pietrobon, William Richardson, and Lloyd Hey.
    • Center for Clinical Effectiveness, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. luo00003@mc.duke.edu
    • Spine. 2003 Aug 1;28(15):1739-45.

    Study DesignSecondary analysis of data collected from spine patients' normal clinic visits from 1998 to 2001.ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey in patients with back pain.Summary Of Background DataThe reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey in patients with back pain has not been previously evaluated.MethodsPatients were asked to complete a comprehensive computerized survey questionnaire during their regular clinic visits. A total of 2520 patients who indicated in their first surveys that they had back pain were included in the study of the reliability and validity of the short form 12-item survey. Of these, 506 patients completed another survey within 3-6 months of follow-up and were included in the responsiveness evaluation.ResultsThe two summary scales of the short form 12-item survey, physical component summary and mental component summary, demonstrated internal consistency reliability, with Cronbach alpha for both scales exceeding the recommended level of 0.70. Correlation of physical component summary and mental component summary with six other measures theoretically related or unrelated to these scales performed as expected without exception, demonstrating the construct validity of the short form 12-item survey. The responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey was supported by several pieces of evidence. First, the changes in physical component summary and mental component summary scores were correlated with the changes in back pain intensity. Second, for patients whose back pain improved, there was a significant increase in the follow-up physical component summary and mental component summary scores as compared to the baseline. Third, small to moderate effect size was observed for patients whose back pain became improved or became worse.ConclusionsThe short form 12-item survey demonstrated good internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness in patients with back pain.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.