• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Mar 2012

    Comparative Study

    Decellularized versus standard cryopreserved valve allografts for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: a single-institution comparison.

    • Mark Ruzmetov, Jitendra J Shah, Dale M Geiss, and Randall S Fortuna.
    • Children Hospital of Illinois, OSF Saint Francis Medical Center, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL 63603, USA.
    • J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2012 Mar 1;143(3):543-9.

    BackgroundStandard cryopreserved valved allografts (SCAs) are recognized as the benchmark for reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). However, SCAs frequently demonstrate early valve deterioration and elicit an immune response. Decellularized cryopreserved valve allografts (SynerGraft, SG) are less immunogenetic and may be more durable. This study analyzed our results of RVOT reconstruction using SGs and compared it with the SCAs used during the same period.MethodsWe reviewed the outcome of all allografts (SG and SCA) that were implanted for RVOT reconstruction at a single center from 2000 to 2005. Echocardiographic data were reviewed to evaluate valve performance. Conduit failure is defined as the need for conduit replacement or reintervention in either the catheterization laboratory or operating room. Conduit dysfunction is defined as RVOT obstruction with peak echocardiographic Doppler gradient greater than 40 mm Hg and/or grade III/IV or greater conduit valve regurgitation. Data were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact test.ResultsFrom January 2000 to April 2005, 100 patients (mean age 18.6 ± 16.8 years) received SG (n = 39) or SCA (n = 61) conduits. The 2 retrospective nonrandomized cohorts were similar with respect to age, gender, weight, conduit indication, bypass and crossclamp time, and conduit size. Follow-up time was not significant between the 2 groups (SG, 5.7 ± 2.5 years vs SCA, 5.8 ± 2.8 years; P = .83). Early and late mortality were similar (SG, 13%; SCA, 10%; P = .75). No death was graft related. Freedom from dysfunction was superior with SG (SG, 74%, vs SCA, 52%; P = .05). Freedom from failure was also better in patients with SG (SG, 87%, vs SCA, 68%; P = .05). Freedom from explantation and more than moderate pulmonary insufficiency were significantly better for SG patients (SG, 92% and 90%, vs SCA, 78% and 68%; P = .02).ConclusionsThis study suggests that the midterm performance of SGs may be superior to that of SCAs. Decellularization of the cryopreserved allografts may provide a more durable option for patients who need RVOT reconstruction. Further long-term follow-up is needed to see whether this decellularization process improves long-term allograft durability.Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.