• Y Nakata, T Goto, H Saito, F Ichinose, S Uezono, and S Morita.
• Department of Anesthesia, Teikyo University School of Medicine Ichihara Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
• Anesth. Analg. 1998 Jul 1;87(1):143-6.

UnlabelledWe sought to determine the anesthetic duration of sevoflurane required to achieve good conditions for placement of a cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) or a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Forty adult ASA physical status I or II patients presenting for elective surgery received single-breath vital capacity inhaled induction with 5% sevoflurane via face mask; thereafter, ventilation was manually assisted. The patients were randomized to receive either a COPA or LMA placement. The time of anesthetic exposure was varied for consecutive patients using the staircase method. The mean (95% confidence interval) anesthetic time required for acceptable COPA placement (100 [55-145] s) was significantly shorter than that for LMA (160 [101-219] s). The 50% and 95% effective doses (from logistic analyses) for acceptable conditions associated with COPA or LMA placement were 90 s and 145 s or 164 s and 261 s, respectively. These findings suggest that COPA insertion is less stimulating than the LMA.ImplicationsThe cuffed oropharyngeal airway is a new airway device that is similar to a laryngeal mask airway in many ways. However, it requires shorter anesthetic duration for successful placement, which suggests that it can be placed with less stimulation. It may be an alternative to a laryngeal mask airway.

18 keywords...

hide…