-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Linear incision and curettage vs. deroofing and drainage in subcutaneous abscess. A randomized clinical trial.
- C Sørensen, A Hjortrup, F Moesgaard, and M Lykkegaard-Nielsen.
- Surgical Department A, Sundby Hospital, Denmark.
- Acta Chir Scand. 1987 Nov 1;153(11-12):659-60.
AbstractLinear incision plus curettage under antibiotic cover was compared with conventional deroofing and drainage of subcutaneous abscess in a randomized study of 50 patients. The median healing time was 9 days following linear incision and curettage and 15 days after deroofing and drainage (p less than 0.05). There was no recurrence of abscess during follow-up for 6 months. Linear incision plus curettage under single-dose antibiotic cover thus proved to be a safe method with significantly shorter healing time than after conventional deroofing an drainage.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.