• N V Jaumard, J K Udupa, S Siegler, J M Schuster, A S Hilibrand, B E Hirsch, A Borthakur, and B A Winkelstein.
• Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
• Med. Hypotheses. 2013 Oct 1;81(4):738-44.

AbstractFor some patients with radiculopathy a source of nerve root compression cannot be identified despite positive electromyography (EMG) evidence. This discrepancy hampers the effective clinical management for these individuals. Although it has been well-established that tissues in the cervical spine move in a three-dimensional (3D) manner, the 3D motions of the neural elements and their relationship to the bones surrounding them are largely unknown even for asymptomatic normal subjects. We hypothesize that abnormal mechanical loading of cervical nerve roots during pain-provoking head positioning may be responsible for radicular pain in those cases in which there is no evidence of nerve root compression on conventional cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the neck in the neutral position. This biomechanical imaging proof-of-concept study focused on quantitatively defining the architectural relationships between the neural and bony structures in the cervical spine using measurements derived from 3D MR images acquired in neutral and pain-provoking neck positions for subjects: (1) with radicular symptoms and evidence of root compression by conventional MRI and positive EMG, (2) with radicular symptoms and no evidence of root compression by MRI but positive EMG, and (3) asymptomatic age-matched controls. Function and pain scores were measured, along with neck range of motion, for all subjects. MR imaging was performed in both a neutral position and a pain-provoking position. Anatomical architectural data derived from analysis of the 3D MR images were compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, and the symptomatic groups with and without imaging evidence of root compression. Several differences in the architectural relationships between the bone and neural tissues were identified between the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups. In addition, changes in architectural relationships were also detected between the symptomatic groups with and without imaging evidence of nerve root compression. As demonstrated in the data and a case study the 3D stress MR imaging approach provides utility to identify biomechanical relationships between hard and soft tissues that are otherwise undetected by standard clinical imaging methods. This technique offers a promising approach to detect the source of radiculopathy to inform clinical management for this pathology.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

20 keywords...

hide…