• Shikha Gupta, Supriya Sampley, Suneet Kathuria, and Sunil Katyal.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
• J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Oct 1;29(4):509-15.

ContextOpioids are being increasingly used these days as adjuvants to local anesthetics in spinal anesthesia.AimThe aim of this study is to compare the effects of adding sufentanil or fentanyl to low dose bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for endoscopic urological procedures.Settings And DesignProspective, randomized, double-blind study.Materials And MethodsA total of 90 elective endoscopic urological surgery patients, 40-80 years old, received spinal anesthesia with 7.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (Group A) or by adding sufentanil 10 g (Group B) or fentanyl 25 g (Group C) to 5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. These groups were compared in terms of the quality of spinal anesthesia as well as analgesia.ResultsThe onset of sensory and motor blockade was significantly rapid in Group A as compared with Groups B and C. The maximum upper level of sensory block was higher in Group A patients than Groups B and C patients. Quality of analgesia was significantly better and prolonged in sufentanil group as compared with other two groups. Motor block was more intense and prolonged in Group A as compared with Groups B and C patients. Request for post-operative analgesic was significantly delayed in Group B patients.ConclusionsSpinal anesthesia for endoscopic urological procedures in elderly patients using low dose bupivacaine (5 mg) combined with 10 μg sufentanil is associated with a lower incidence of hemodynamic instability, better quality and prolonged duration as compared to that by adding 25 μg fentanyl.

5 keywords...

hide…