• Critical care medicine · Apr 2000

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of direct examination of three types of bronchoscopy specimens used to diagnose nosocomial pneumonia.

    • B Veber, B Souweine, B Gachot, S Chevret, J P Bedos, D Decre, M C Dombret, B Dureuil, and M Wolff.
    • Service de réanimation chirurgicale, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France.
    • Crit. Care Med. 2000 Apr 1;28(4):962-8.

    ObjectiveTo compare direct examination of bronchial aspirate and plugged telescopic catheter specimens (PTC) with infected cell counts in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens for the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia.DesignProspective study of critically ill patients.SettingIntensive care unit in a university hospital.PatientsA total of 64 patients hospitalized for >48 hrs with suspected nosocomial pneumonia.InterventionsFiberoptic bronchoscopy with bronchial aspirate and quantitative protected specimen brush, PTC, and BAL cultures. PTC and bronchial aspirate specimens were Gram-stained. BAL specimens for infected cell counts were examined as described previously in the literature.Measurements And Main ResultsNosocomial pneumonia was diagnosed by the medical staff based on all available clinical, radiologic, laboratory test, and microbiological data and on the course before and after appropriate therapy. A total of 71% of patients were ventilated, and 70.1% were receiving antibiotics. Nosocomial pneumonia was diagnosed in 54% of the cases. On direct examination, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of bronchial aspirate specimens were Se, 82% and Sp, 60%; of BAL with 5% infected cells, Se, 56% and Sp, 100%; of BAL with 3% infected cells, Se, 74% and Sp, 96%; of PTC specimens, Se, 65% and Sp, 76%; and of PTC specimens plus BAL with 3% infected cells, Se, 83% and Sp, 78%. BAL with 3% infected cells was significantly better for predicting nosocomial pneumonia than direct examination of bronchial aspirate or PTC specimens (p = .0012). When the BAL showed 3% infected cells, neither direct examination of bronchial aspirate nor direct examination of PTC specimens was useful (p = .24 and p = .38, respectively). Combined use of direct examination of PTC specimens plus BAL with 3% infected cells markedly improved sensitivity. The total cost of each procedure was taken into account for the final evaluation.ConclusionsOur data suggest that BAL with 3% infected cells is currently the only test whose predictive value for nosocomial pneumonia is sufficiently high to be of use for guiding the initial choice of antimicrobial class while waiting for quantitative culture results.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.