• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Nov 2014

    [Risks acceptability related to obstetrical epidural analgesia].

    • O Breton, F Vial, J Feugeas, K Podrez, K Hosseini, S Boileau, P Guerci, H Bouaziz, Les membres du bureau de l’Institut lorrain d'anesthésie-réanimation (Ilar), F Aubert, G Audibert, J Borgo, Y Chalot, F Didelot, T Fuchs-Buder, J Hotton, E Junke, J -M Lalot, M -R Losser, and A Pierron.
    • Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, maternité régionale de Nancy, 10, rue du Docteur-Heydenreich, 54000 Nancy, France.
    • Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2014 Nov 1;33(11):581-6.

    ObjectivesEvaluation of the acceptability of complications related to obstetrical epidural analgesia in two populations, parturients and anesthesiologists.Study DesignProspective, transversal, single center study.Materials And MethodsEvaluation of the acceptability of complications associated with obstetric epidural analgesia performed using a questionnaire of six clinical scenarii in two populations: parturients cared at the University maternity of Nancy and anesthesiologists of Lorraine. Patients were interviewed by an anesthesiologist, physicians via Internet. Acceptability was assessed using two tools, the absolute acceptability with a visual analog scale and the relative acceptability obtained by classifying clinical scenario against each other, in ascending order of acceptability.ResultsOne hundred and forty-six parturients and 87 anesthetists assessed the acceptability of the different scenarios. The three less serious scenarios (hypotension, failure, dural tap) were acceptable for both populations. One case (spinal hematoma) was unacceptable for parturients. Three cases of varying severity (failure, dural tap, plexus injury with sequelae) were judged significantly less acceptable by patients than physicians (5.9 vs. 7.9 [P<0.001], 5.75 vs. 8.1 [P<0.01], 4.1 vs. 5.1 [P=0.035]). Multivariate analysis did not show any predictive factor of acceptability in both populations.ConclusionIn this study, the overall acceptability of the inherent complications of epidural analgesia was good in the two populations. It was essentially based on the notion of severity and preventability. A large interindividual variability was observed and a better acceptance by the anesthesiologists.Copyright © 2014 Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.