• Clinical pediatrics · Jul 1992

    Interobserver variability in assessing pediatric postextubation stridor.

    • K J Kemper, M S Benson, and M J Bishop.
    • Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle.
    • Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1992 Jul 1; 31 (7): 405-8.

    AbstractThe reliability of parameters used to assess pediatric postextubation upper respiratory distress is unknown. We prospectively studied the interobserver reliability of six parameters commonly used to assess respiratory distress in children. Eligible patients were less than 15 years old and hospitalized for traumatic injuries at Harborview Medical Center between March and September 1989. At extubation, patients were examined independently by a physician, a nurse, and a respiratory therapist, each of whom evaluated respiratory rate (RR), stridor, air movement, flaring/retractions (F/R), level of consciousness (LOC), and oxygen saturation (O2 sat). Reliability was measured by percentage agreement and weighted kappa (Kw). The 25 children (27 extubations) had a median age of 7 years, and eight of the 27 required treatment for upper airway obstruction. Percentage agreement ranged from 82% (for air movement) to 96% (for O2 sat). Weighted kappas were excellent for RR and F/R (Kw greater than .6); moderate for LOC, stridor, and O2 sat (0.4 less than Kw less than .06); and poor for air movement (Kw less than .4). Further improvements in interobserver agreement are required to provide more consistent upper airway management in critically ill children.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.