• Kari Santoro Beer and Deborah C Silverstein.
• Department of Clinical Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
• J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2015 Jan 1; 25 (1): 101-6.

ObjectiveTo review the literature supporting or discouraging the use of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion in critically ill patients.Data SourcesHuman and animal publications were searched using PubMed without time limits and the following keywords were used: "fresh frozen plasma," "coagulopathy," "hypocoagulable state," "hypercoagulable states," and "critical illness."Human Data SynthesisThe commonly used tests of coagulation (eg, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio) are poorly predictive of clinical bleeding. FFP use in critically ill patients is unlikely to result in improved outcomes and may be associated with increased risks.Veterinary Data SynthesisThere is insufficient evidence to make definitive conclusions regarding the use of FFP in critically ill animals, but clinical studies are underway that may provide further data that clarify the optimal use of FFP in animals.ConclusionsThe use of FFP in critically ill patients remains controversial. In the absence of clinical bleeding or a risk for clinical bleeding associated with a planned procedure, treatment use of FFP is not recommended in human patients. There are insufficient data in critically ill animals to enable formulation of recommendations. Further research is warranted in dogs and cats to establish evidence-based guidelines.© Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society 2015.

27 keywords...

hide…