• Allen Maniker and Marian Passannante.
• Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute of New Jersey, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA. maniker@umdnj.edu
• J. Neurosurg. 2003 Jun 1; 98 (6): 1159-64.

ObjectThe goal of this study was to determine current practice patterns and attitudes of neurosurgeons toward peripheral nerve surgery.MethodsA 13-question survey was mailed to all active members of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Collected responses were entered into a database and were analyzed using statistical software.ConclusionsOf 3800 surveys mailed there were 1728 responses for a 45% response rate. Analysis of the data revealed that respondents had a greater comfort level with simple peripheral nerve procedures, such as carpal tunnel release, and a lack of comfort with more complex peripheral nerve procedures, such as brachial plexus exploration. The majority of simple cases were treated by the surveyed neurosurgeons, whereas the majority of complex cases were referred to other surgeons, primarily to other neurosurgeons. The type of medical practice (academic, group, or solo) and the location of the practice (major city, small city, suburban setting, or rural area) showed a statistically significant correlation to simple case referral patterns, whereas the length of time since the respondent underwent training did not. Practice type and location, and years since training showed a statistically significant correlation to complex case referral patterns. Only 48.7% of the respondents believed that they had been given sufficient exposure to peripheral nerve surgery during residency training. The overwhelming majority (97.2%) of respondents favored keeping peripheral nerve surgery as part of the neurosurgical curriculum.

23 keywords...

hide…