• J Clin Anesth · May 1995

    Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial

    Use of patient-controlled analgesia with alfentanil for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

    • H I Kortis, D W Amory, B K Wagner, R Levin, E Wilson, A Levin, D E Pitchford, and P Pollak.
    • Department of Anesthesia, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick 08903-0019, USA.
    • J Clin Anesth. 1995 May 1; 7 (3): 205-10.

    Study ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) to physician-controlled analgesia in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).DesignProspective, randomized trial.SettingNew Jersey Kidney Stone Treatment Center at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ.Patients62 ASA I, II, and III patients undergoing ESWL.InterventionsThe control group (n = 29) received physician-controlled analgesia with continuous infusions (0.75 mcg/kg/min) and intermittent boluses (5 mcg/kg) of alfentanil. PCA patients (n = 33) initially received alfentanil 0.5 mcg/kg followed by a continuous background infusion (0.2 to 0.5 mcg/kg/min) and self-administered alfentanil (3 to 5 mcg/kg) with a 5-minute lockout period. Bolus doses and infusion rates were determined by patient comfort and cardiorespiratory response to alfentanil.Measurements And Main ResultsPrior to the procedure, the patients completed two questionnaires (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales). During ESWL, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO2, and pain and sedation levels were measured at 0, 800, 1,600, 2,400, and 3,000 shock waves. The total doses of alfentanil administered were calculated. PCA patients received 31% less alfentanil than control group patients (p < 0.0001). Patients with more preoperative anxiety required larger doses of alfentanil (p < 0.05). The pain level was slightly higher in the patients receiving PCA (p > 0.05) but most patients reported either no or only mild pain. Side effects from the therapy, such as nausea and vomiting, were either not present or were mild in both groups, with one patient (3% to 4%) in each group reporting mild nausea. Both patients and urologists were very satisfied with the pain management in both groups.ConclusionsPCA is a useful alternative to physician-controlled analgesia during ESWL since it provides equivalent pain control while using less alfentanil.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.