• Catherine Smyth, Nadera Ahmadzai, Jason Wentzell, Ashley Pardoe, Andrew Tse, Tiffany Nguyen, Yvette Goddard, Shona Nair, Patricia A Poulin, Becky Skidmore, and Mohammed T Ansari.
• Department of Anesthesiology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital-General Campus, 501 Smyth Rd., CCW 1551, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada. csmyth@toh.on.ca.
• Drugs. 2015 Nov 1; 75 (17): 1957-80.

AbstractThe intrathecal drug-delivery system (IDDS) is one mode of infusing analgesic medications directly into the cerebrospinal fluid in close proximity to their site of action. This modality has been employed in patients with refractory pain either due to malignant or non-malignant causes for over 30 years. Unfortunately, and despite the number of years it has been in use, there is still a scarcity of rigorous evidence to guide its integration into clinical practice. Current best evidence is inconclusive as to the comparative effectiveness and harms of the IDDS relative to routine medical care of patients. There are far more systematic reviews than high-quality primary comparative studies of the IDDS vs. conventional pain treatment. Existing clinical practice recommendations are best viewed as expert opinion with competing interests. This article will review the existing literature for indications, contraindications, consensus statements, different technologies, and complications of the IDDS. Although approved analgesics for IDDS delivery are limited to morphine and ziconotide, many other analgesics, alone or in combination, are routinely used in this setting. This review will also focus on the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of intrathecal medications extensively used in clinical practice; including agents approved, unapproved, and under development.

27 keywords...

hide…