-
Comparative Study
[Inadequate hospital admissions and inactive days of hospital stay in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung neoplasms].
- J Bañeres, J Alonso, J Broquetas, and J M Antó.
- Departamento de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Instituto Municipal de Investigación Médica, Barcelona.
- Med Clin Barcelona. 1993 Mar 20; 100 (11): 407-11.
BackgroundThis study was carried out to evaluate the hypothesis that the proportion of inadequate hospital admissions and days is greater in patients with pulmonary neoplasm than in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) given the therapeutic and diagnostic features of both diseases and to establish the applicability of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP).MethodsA retrospective review was performed of the medical records of patients admitted for COPD and pulmonary neoplasm. Two external physicians reviewed the clinical histories using the AEP. Admissions and hospital days considered as potentially inadequate by the reviewers were supervised by a clinical epidemiological panel which confirmed and identified the causes for inadequacy. One hundred sixty-six patients admitted with COPD and 79 with pulmonary neoplasm selected by a systematic sample of admissions whose principal diagnosis was COPD or pulmonary neoplasm were studied over one year in a tertiary level teaching hospital in Barcelona.ResultsIt was found that 4.8% of the admissions with COPD and 15.5% of the days of hospital stay were inappropriate while in patients with pulmonary neoplasm 14% of the admissions and 40% of the days of hospital stay were inappropriate. The main causes of inadequacy were: social (33.3% in patients with COPD); patients inadequately admitted but who remained in hospital to undergo diagnostic tests which could have been performed on an out patients basis (46% in patients with pulmonary neoplasm).ConclusionsInappropriateness was greater in admissions and in hospital days with greater diagnostic components (pulmonary neoplasm) than in fundamentally therapeutic cases (COPD). The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol was valid in this hospital with the supervising panel being very useful in the judgement of cases not clearly established in the protocol. The level of inadequacy was found to be similar to that of other studies although the results are not directly comparable.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.