• Zentralbl Chir · Oct 2011

    Comparative Study Controlled Clinical Trial

    [Effectiveness of nephroprotection by the selection of contrast media used during vascular interventions in patients with chronic renal failure?].

    • E Schönefeld, S Höwler, N Osada, and G Torsello.
    • Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie, St-Franziskushospital, Gefäßchirurgie, Münster, Deutschland. Eva.Schoenefeld@ukmuenster.de
    • Zentralbl Chir. 2011 Oct 1; 136 (5): 426-30.

    BackgroundThe increasing number of endovascular procedures made aware of a kidney disease induced by contrast media (CM). Contrast-induced nephropathy (= CIN) can develop in 0.6-44 % of the treated patients by angiography and / or endovascular intervention. The incidence in high-risk patients ranges from 50 to 70 %. In most cases CIN is inconspicuous and reversible. But pre-existing chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, age and variable different risk factors (e. g., PAOD) can induce irreversible renal impairment. The purpose of the presented trial is to investigate incidence, predictors, and out-come of CIN in chronic renal failure patients using two different CM; one non-ionic isoosmolar -iodixanol and the other non-ionic low-osmolar iopromide.MethodsTo evaluate the incidence of CIN after endovascular diagnostics and intervention two collectives of 100  patients with chronic renal insufficiency were treated with different contrast media (CM). Inclusion followed prospectively in two collectives. One collective received iopromide (Ultravist™, Bayer Health Care, Lever-kusen, Germany), and the second hundred patients received iodixanol (Visipaque™, Nycomed Amersham, Princeton, New Jersey). Demographics, comorbidities, procedure-related data were completed by serum creatinine levels and GFR (= glomerular filtration rate). Inclusion criteria were a serum creatinine level ≥ 1.5 mg% and a GFR ≤ 60 mL / min. Those parameters were measured twice pre-interventionally, and one time 48-72  hours after the endovascular procedure.ResultsCollectives were homogenous and comparable concerning pre-existing risk factors, age and gender. Renal function stayed at a constant level and was independent of contrast medium selection, repectively. Average creatinine levels ranged around 1.77 mg% ± 0.75  standard deviation (SD) pre-interventionally; postinterventional measurement exposed a creatinine level of 1.74 mg% ± 0.74 SD as mean of both collectives. GFR (preinterventional 39.64 mL / min ± 12.48 SD) increased non-significantly to 45.48 mL / min ± 16.82 SD. Pre-existing chronic kidney disease had no effect on renal function parameters; no other risk factors could be evaluated.ConclusionAccording to cost-effectiveness a low-osmolar monomeric contrast medium (LOCM) is a sufficient selection, under careful renal function control.© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart ˙ New York.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…