• Shock · Jan 2002

    Review

    Sepsis research in the next millennium: concentrate on the software rather than the hardware.

    • Thorsten Tjardes and Edmund Neugebauer.
    • 2nd Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, Germany.
    • Shock. 2002 Jan 1; 17 (1): 1-8.

    AbstractToday the basic principles of septic conditions are understood. Nevertheless, sepsis research has reached a critical point. To integrate our knowledge towards a consistent theory of the disease process and to derive effective therapies, new perspectives for future research that fit the complexity of the problem have to be found. We conducted a review of the literature concerning systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis with particular reference to liver pathophysiology. And compared our findings with characteristic features of complex systems. The complexity of sepsis is broadly recognized. A review of the different aspects of liver inflammation during SIRS and sepsis, i.e. endotoxin challenge, cytokine induced dysfunction, the mechanisms of leukocyte transmigration, and hormonal and neuroendocrine regulatory mechanisms is given. Key aspects of complex systems, including parallelism, locality, emergence, and cross-scale interactions are introduced. We conclude that sepsis research needs new perspectives that allow us to handle the complex interactions occurring during the disease process. We propose to focus research on the interactions between the constituents of the system rather than only describing isolated aspects of the disease process. We also conclude that the ideas and techniques of non-linear systems theory are suitable tools for the analysis of complex and dynamic diseases like SIRS and sepsis.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.