• Zentralbl Chir · Oct 2013

    Review

    [Lung cancer screening - where are we in 2013?].

    • H Prosch and G Mostbeck.
    • Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Medizinische Universität Wien, Österreich.
    • Zentralbl Chir. 2013 Oct 1; 138 Suppl 1: S11-5.

    AbstractLung cancer is one of the leading causes of death in Europe and the USA. A relatively good prognosis is limited to those patients in whom the tumor is detected at an early stage. As clinical symptoms of lung cancer are a late finding in the natural course of the disease, most of the patients are diagnosed at an advanced tumor stage when palliative care remains the only therapeutic option. For this reason, early diagnosis of lung cancer might save lives. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), in the U. S. A., provided evidence that screening with low-dose CT (LD-CT) is able to reduce lung cancer mortality by 20.0 %. The encouraging results of the NLST, however, could not be confirmed by the preliminary results of ongoing European trials. Even if the European trials are able to confirm a reduction in lung cancer mortality by LD-CT, a number of important questions must be answered before the implementation of nationwide screening programs. First of all, the population that might benefit from CT lung cancer screening has to be defined precisely. Furthermore, guidelines have to be established about how to manage screening participants with detected lung nodules, as the vast majority of these pulmonary nodules will prove to be benign. This review article summarizes the results of the NLST and the initial data from the European screening trials, and will discuss some of the major open questions in lung cancer screening with CT.Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.