• J W Ho, H J Khambatta, L M Pang, R N Siegfried, and L S Sun.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
• Reg Anesth. 1997 Mar 1; 22 (2): 125-30.

Background And ObjectivesPreemptive analgesia has been evident in animals, but few adult human studies exist demonstrating this concept exist, and there are fewer still in children. Caudal epidural blocks with local anesthetics are often placed for postoperative analgesia in children. This study evaluated whether these blocks are more effective when placed prior to surgical incision.MethodsChildren aged 1-6 years and ASA I and II (n = 51), undergoing elective herniorrhaphy, orchidopexy, or circumcision were randomly assigned to receive a caudal epidural block with 0.6 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, either before incision (n = 28) or after surgery (n = 23). In all patients, anesthesia was induced and maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide, and halothane, and caudal epidural blocks were placed. Postoperative pain was scored by a blinded observer using a Faces Pain Scale in the recovery room and was also assessed at home by the parents. Analgesic requirement during the 24-hour period was recorded.ResultsThe Faces Pain Scale scores and analgesic requirements did not differ between the groups, either in the recovery room or at home (P > .05).ConclusionsAlthough preemptive analgesia has been successfully demonstrated in some earlier clinical studies, our results indicate that pre- and postincisional caudal epidural blocks with 0.25% bupivacaine were equally effective in children.

21 keywords...

hide…