• Eur. J. Cancer · Sep 2012

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality.

    • Roger Stupp, Eric T Wong, Andrew A Kanner, David Steinberg, Herbert Engelhard, Volkmar Heidecke, Eilon D Kirson, Sophie Taillibert, Frank Liebermann, Vladimir Dbalý, Zvi Ram, J Lee Villano, Nikolai Rainov, Uri Weinberg, David Schiff, Lara Kunschner, Jeffrey Raizer, Jerome Honnorat, Andrew Sloan, Mark Malkin, Joseph C Landolfi, Franz Payer, Maximilian Mehdorn, Robert J Weil, Susan C Pannullo, Manfred Westphal, Martin Smrcka, Lawrence Chin, Herwig Kostron, Silvia Hofer, Jeffrey Bruce, Rees Cosgrove, Nina Paleologous, Yoram Palti, and Philip H Gutin.
    • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. Roger.Stupp@chuv.ch
    • Eur. J. Cancer. 2012 Sep 1; 48 (14): 2192-202.

    PurposeNovoTTF-100A is a portable device delivering low-intensity, intermediate frequency electric fields via non-invasive, transducer arrays. Tumour Treatment Fields (TTF), a completely new therapeutic modality in cancer treatment, physically interfere with cell division.MethodsPhase III trial of chemotherapy-free treatment of NovoTTF (20-24h/day) versus active chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Primary end-point was improvement of overall survival.ResultsPatients (median age 54 years (range 23-80), Karnofsky performance status 80% (range 50-100) were randomised to TTF alone (n=120) or active chemotherapy control (n=117). Number of prior treatments was two (range 1-6). Median survival was 6.6 versus 6.0 months (hazard ratio 0.86 [95% CI 0.66-1.12]; p=0.27), 1-year survival rate was 20% and 20%, progression-free survival rate at 6 months was 21.4% and 15.1% (p=0.13), respectively in TTF and active control patients. Responses were more common in the TTF arm (14% versus 9.6%, p=0.19). The TTF-related adverse events were mild (14%) to moderate (2%) skin rash beneath the transducer arrays. Severe adverse events occurred in 6% and 16% (p=0.022) of patients treated with TTF and chemotherapy, respectively. Quality of life analyses favoured TTF therapy in most domains.ConclusionsThis is the first controlled trial evaluating an entirely novel cancer treatment modality delivering electric fields rather than chemotherapy. No improvement in overall survival was demonstrated, however efficacy and activity with this chemotherapy-free treatment device appears comparable to chemotherapy regimens that are commonly used for recurrent glioblastoma. Toxicity and quality of life clearly favoured TTF.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.