• Cosette M Wheeler, William C Hunt, Jack Cuzick, Erika Langsfeld, Michael Robertson, Philip E Castle, and New Mexico HPV Pap Registry Steering Committee.
• Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, House of Prevention Epidemiology (HOPE), Albuquerque, NM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, House of Prevention Epidemiology (HOPE), Albuquerque, NM.
• Int. J. Cancer. 2014 Aug 1; 135 (3): 624-34.

AbstractThere are limited data on the prospective risks of detecting cervical precancer and cancer in United States (US) populations specifically where the delivery of opportunistic cervical screening takes place outside managed care and in the absence of organized national programs. Such data will inform the management of women with positive screening results before and after widespread human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and establishes a baseline preceding recent changes in US cervical cancer screening guidelines. Using data reported to the statewide passive surveillance systems of the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry, we measured the 3-year HPV type-specific cumulative incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe (CIN2+) and grade 3 or more severe (CIN3+) detected during real-world health care delivery across a diversity of organizations, payers, clinical settings, providers and patients. A stratified sample of 47,541 cervical cytology specimens from a screening population of 379,000 women underwent HPV genotyping. Three-year risks for different combinations of cytologic interpretation and HPV risk group ranged from <1% (for several combinations) to approximately 70% for CIN2+ and 55% for CIN3+ in women with high-grade (HSIL) cytology and HPV16 infection. A substantial proportion of CIN2+ (35.7%) and CIN3+ (30.9%) were diagnosed following negative cytology, of which 62.3 and 78.2%, respectively, were high-risk HPV positive. HPV16 had the greatest 3-year risks (10.9% for CIN2+,8.0% for CIN3+) followed by HPV33, HPV31, and HPV18. Positive results for high-risk HPV, especially HPV16, the severity of cytologic interpretation, and age contribute independently to the risks of CIN2+ and CIN3+.© 2013 The Authors. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of UICC.

42 keywords...

hide…