• Arch Phys Med Rehabil · Apr 2008

    Reliability of the assessment of lumbar range of motion and maximal isometric strength in patients with chronic low back pain.

    • Nathalie A Roussel, Steven Truijen, Ilse De Kerf, Dirk Lambeets, Jo Nijs, and Gaëtane Stassijns.
    • Division of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Department of Health Sciences, University College of Antwerp, Belgium. n.roussel@ha.be
    • Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr 1; 89 (4): 788-91.

    ObjectiveTo examine the interobserver reliability of the assessment of lumbar range of motion (ROM) and maximal isometric strength in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) using commercially available equipment.DesignA prospective repeated-measures design.SettingAmbulatory care in a university hospital.ParticipantsTwelve patients (5 men, 7 women; age range, 20-52y) with CLBP, with a mean visual analog scale score of 31.5+/-25.8mm, volunteered for the study. The duration of their symptoms was 63+/-115 months and the mean Oswestry Disability Index score was 31%.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresMovements of the lumbar spine were assessed with commercially available equipment. Both the range of motion (ROM) and the maximal isometric strength for flexion, extension, lateroflexion, and rotation of the lumbar spine were evaluated twice to analyze the interobserver reliability. The same test procedure was performed on 2 separate days by 2 investigators who were blinded to the outcome of the assessment of their colleague. The order of investigator was balanced, so that each investigator tested the same number of patients as first investigator.ResultsThe intraclass correlation coefficient varied between .91 and .98 for the measurements of the lumbar ROM and was between .93 and .97 for all the strength measurements. Post hoc power analysis confirmed previous power analysis, that is, despite the small sample size, an excellent power was found for the observed interobserver reliability coefficients (power range, 0.93-1.00). No learning effect was found when comparing the results of the second measurement with the first measurement (P>.05).ConclusionsThe interobserver reliability is excellent for the measurement of the ROM of the lumbar spine and for the maximal isometric strength using specific devices in patients with CLBP.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…