• M A Wahab, P Karantzis, P S Eccersley, I F Russell, J W Thompson, and S W Lindow.
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hull Maternity Hospital.
• Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Sep 1; 106 (9): 913-6.

ObjectiveTo determine the surgical and anaesthetic benefits and problems associated with the practice of routine exteriorisation of the uterus to facilitate repair at caesarean section.DesignA randomised controlled study of women undergoing caesarean section. After establishment of anaesthesia, women were randomised to either exteriorisation and uterine repair or suture of the uterus in the abdomen.SettingA maternity hospital in the United Kingdom.Main Outcome MeasuresPeri-operative haemoglobin change, duration of operation, maternal morbidity and length of hospital stay. Intra-operative pain, nausea, vomiting, pulling or tugging sensations were secondary outcome measures.ResultsThree hundred and sixteen women were randomised, of whom 288 were subsequently analysed (139 women in whom the uterus was exteriorised and 149 where the uterus was not exteriorised). Exteriorisation of the uterus, an elective caesarean section and a spinal or general anaesthesia each had a statistically significant association with reduced blood loss (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to intra-operative complications or pain, nor were there any statistically significant difference in post-operative wound sepsis, pyrexia, deep vein thrombosis, blood transfusion or length of hospital stay.ConclusionWith effective anaesthesia, exteriorisation of the uterus for repair following caesarean delivery is not associated with significant problems and is associated with less blood loss.

21 keywords...

hide…