• S J Neuhaus, D I Watson, T Ellis, T Lafullarde, G G Jamieson, and W J Russell.
• University of Adelaide, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia.
• ANZ J Surg. 2001 Aug 1; 71 (8): 447-52.

BackgroundPrevious studies using animal models have demonstrated that carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy is associated with adverse physiological, metabolic, immunological and oncological effects, and many of these problems can be avoided by the use of helium insufflation. The present study was performed in patients to compare the effect of helium and CO2 insufflation on intraperitoneal markers of immunological and metabolic function.MethodsEighteen patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal laparoscopic surgery were randomized to have insufflation achieved by using either helium (n = 8) or CO2 (n = 10) gas. Intraperitoneal pH was monitored continuously during surgery, and peritoneal macrophage function was determined by harvesting peritoneal macrophages at 5 min and 30 min after commencing laparoscopy, and then assessing their ability to produce tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and their phagocytic function.ResultsCarbon dioxide laparoscopy was associated with a lower intraperitoneal pH at the commencement of laparoscopy, although this difference disappeared as surgery progressed. The production of TNF-alpha was better preserved by CO2 laparoscopy, but the insufflation gas used did not affect macrophage phagocytosis. Patients undergoing helium laparoscopy required less postoperative analgesia.ConclusionThe choice of insufflation gas can affect intraperitoneal macrophage function in the clinical setting, and possibly acid-base balance. The present study suggested no immunological advantages for the clinical use of helium as an insufflation gas. The outcomes of the present study, however, are different to those obtained from previous laboratory studies and further research is needed to confirm this outcome.

41 keywords...

hide…