• J N Alastair Gibson, Jonathan G Cowie, and Menno Iprenburg.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, United Kingdom. j.n.a.gibson@blueyonder.co.uk
• Surg J R Coll Surg E. 2012 Oct 1; 10 (5): 290-6.

BackgroundLumbar disc prolapse is common and the primary method of care in most centres is still open discectomy facilitated by microscope or loupe magnification and illumination. Hospitalisation may be less than 24 h, but post-operative pain usually requires an overnight stay. This review describes transforaminal endoscopic spinal surgery (TESS) using HD-video technology, that is generally performed as a day case procedure under sedation or light general anaesthesia, and collates the evidence comparing the technique to microdiscectomy.MethodsThe method of TESS is described and an electronic literature search performed to identify papers reporting clinical outcomes. International data were translated where necessary and proceedings' abstracts included. In addition, papers held by the authors and colleagues in personal libraries were carefully cross-referenced to the obtained database.ResultsAnalysis of the data supports the use of a transforaminal endoscopic approach to the lumbar intervertebral disc and suggests that outcomes following surgery are at least equivalent to those following microdiscectomy. Significant cost-savings in terms of in-patient stay may be generated. In addition, there is also some evidence supporting endoscopic surgery for relief of foraminal stenosis.ConclusionBased on current evidence there are good arguments supporting a more wide-spread adoption of transforaminal endoscopic surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc prolapse with or without foraminal stenosis.Crown Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

18 keywords...

hide…